Legal Opinion

State v. Ball

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1914No. 19,485PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The defendant was prosecuted under section 2 of chapter 179 of the Laws of 1913, which provides that any person who shall keep or assist in maintaining a house of concubinage or where the same is practiced, permitted or allowed on premises owned or leased by him or under his control shall be deemed guilty of a felony. The information charged that on or about November 27, 1913, the defendant did unlawfully and feloniously keep and maintain a house o t concubinage at a certain number on East Third street of Ottawa, Franklin county, “in which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BridgmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
  2. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. State v. WheelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. People v. SkuttMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State v. HetrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API