State v. Ball
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
West, J.:
The defendant was prosecuted under section 2 of chapter 179 of the Laws of 1913, which provides that any person who shall keep or assist in maintaining a house of concubinage or where the same is practiced, permitted or allowed on premises owned or leased by him or under his control shall be deemed guilty of a felony. The information charged that on or about November 27, 1913, the defendant did unlawfully and feloniously keep and maintain a house o t concubinage at a certain number on East Third street of Ottawa, Franklin county, “in which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BridgmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- State v. WheelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- People v. SkuttMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. HetrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918