Legal Opinion

United States v. Ernest Coney, A/K/A "Jerome" Ernest Coney

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 20, 1997No. 96-1740PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Chief Judge.

Christine Adair, counsel for appellant Ernest Coney, has moved for leave to withdraw from her representation of the appellant. The motion raises an issue of the application of our local appellate rules.

Coney was convicted and sentenced as a result of a violation of probation. After he filed a pro se petition for appeal, Adair, who represented him in the district court, was appointed by this court pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act of 1964, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. She appropriately briefed the matter on appeal, and the decision of the district court was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Charles Ahumada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Hawkins, Robert A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API