Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 13, 2016No. Docket No. 15-827PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATZMANN, Chief Judge:

The Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, entitles financially eligible defendants to the assistance of counsel when petitioning for a writ of certiorari. In Nnebe v. United States, we held that the “unusual remedy” of recalling a mandate is available when counsel appointed under the CJA interferes with that right by “promis[ing] to file a certiorari petition, but failing] to do so.” 534 F.3d 87, 88, 91 (2d Cir.2008). Recalling the mandate allows us to reenter judgment in the direct appeal and, thus, restart the clock for filing a petition so that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Calderon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Stevens v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Waldman v. Palestine Liberation Org.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. Charles Ahumada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Waldman v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  4. Belle v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. Belle v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API