Legal Opinion

Reycraft v. McDonald

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1916No. Docket No. 128PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Emmet; Shepherd, J. Case by John J. Reycraft against Dudley McDonald for slander. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPerson, J.

This is an action for slander, and at the trial the circuit judge directed a verdict for defendant. *501Plaintiff brings the case to this court by writ of error. The alleged slanderous words were used in a statement made by defendant to the probate judge of the county, in his official capacity, to the effect that plaintiff was insane and needed hospital treatment. The statement was made in the office of the judge of probate when only defendant and the judge were present. It is clear from the record that it was for the purpose of instituting proceedings by which plaintiff’s alleged insanity should…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flynn v. BoglarskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bailey v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Dunbar v. GreenlawSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  3. Shumway v. WarrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. MacGriff v. Van AntwerpMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Dabkowski v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API