Legal Opinion
MacGriff v. Van Antwerp
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1950No. Docket Nos. 23, 24, 25, Calendar Nos. 44,422, 44,423, 44,424PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.
Jack Edwards MacGriff, Floyd Mc-Griff and Joe Y. Wade each began a separate but similar suit against the defendants. Similar facts are alleged in the declaration filed in each case. After motions duly made, an order of dismissal as to defendants James N. McNally, Edwin Scott and William Long was entered in each case. We designate them herein as appellees. By agreement of counsel and order of the court the 3 cases were consolidated for the purpose of an appeal, and they will be so considered. The sole question involved is whether the declaration in each case states a cause of action against…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mundy v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Roche v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Society of Good Neighbors v. Mayor of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Reycraft v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cortez v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Pursell v. Wolverine-Pentronix, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Royal Palace Homes, Inc v. Channel 7 of Detroit, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Tocco v. PiersanteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Wynn v. ColeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.