Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Greenlaw

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 17, 1956PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

The defendant excepts to the overruling of his demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended declaration in tort.

Defendant is a physician. The plaintiff accuses him of having erroneously certified in ancillary, emergency, insanity, detention proceedings, R. S., Chap. 27, Sec. 105, without sufficient inquiry or examination, that the plaintiff was insane. Plaintiff was detained in a state hospital and claims resultant damage.

The amended declaration contains the following recitation of the standard of care legally required by the plaintiff from the defendant and of the defendant’s failure to fulfill it:

“It…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mezullo v. MaletzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  2. Rice v. CoolidgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Linder v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Fisher and Fisher v. PayneSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. Williams v. LeBarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bruce v. Byrne-Stevens & Associates Engineers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Bailey v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Bromund v. HoltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Jensen v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Jensen v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API