Legal Opinion

Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 11, 1996No. 94-1863PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stupak-Thrall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kathy Stupak-Thrall,plaintiffs-Appellees v. Daniel Glickman,defendants, the Wilderness Society, Proposed Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. Daniel GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. GabrionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Stupak-Thrall v. GlickmanDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Herr v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API