Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stupak-Thrall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kathy Stupak-Thrall,plaintiffs-Appellees v. Daniel Glickman,defendants, the Wilderness Society, Proposed Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. Daniel GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. GabrionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Stupak-Thrall v. GlickmanDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- Herr v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.