Legal Opinion

Stupak-Thrall v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1995No. 94-1863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

70 F.3d 881

64 USLW 2359, 26 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,225

Kathy STUPAK-THRALL, Michael A. Gajewski, and Bodil

Gajewski, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES of America and Daniel R. Glickman,

1 Secretary of Agriculture,

individually and in his official

capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-1863.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 19, 1995.

Decided Nov. 29, 1995.

Todd S. Welch (argued and briefed), William P. Pendley, Mountain States Legal Foundation, Denver, CO, for Kathy Stupak-Thrall.

Todd S. Welch, Mark D. Tousignant, Iron River, MI, for Michael A. Gajewski, Bodil Gajewski.

Peter A.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. City Management Corp. v. U.S. Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Borlem S.A.—Empreedimentos Industriais v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kathy Stupak-Thrall v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Ace Lobster Co., Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2001
  3. David Herr v. United States Forest Serv.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API