Legal Opinion

Queen Insurance Co. of America v. Kaiser

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1965PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue is — do the terms of the exculpatory clause of the lease exonerate the lessor from liability for damages sustained by the lessee and caused by the negligence of the lessor.

It is conceded that the plaintiff insurer cannot recover under its subrogation agreement unless its insured (tenant Bruner) had a right to recovery. Frederick v. Great Northern R. Co. (1932), 207 Wis. 234, 240 N. W. 387, 241 N. W. 363.

The legality of an exculpatory clause has not been challenged by the plaintiff.

“The basis upon which the courts have upheld the validity of exculpatory clauses in lease contracts has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Prange-Geussenhainer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lerner v. HeicklenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Frederick v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Moroder v. FoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Merten v. NathanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. College Mobile Home Park & Sales, Inc. v. HoffmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  4. Operton v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Republicbank Dallas, N.A. v. First Wisconsin National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API