Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Home Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 8, 1979No. 78-234PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case concerns the validity of an exculpatory clause contained in an apartment lease.

In October, 1974 Charlotte Kirsch and her son moved into a ground floor apartment located in Burlington, Wisconsin. The apartment building was owned by Manuel Mendez who employed Lawrence Middleton to act as caretaker. Kirsch occupied the apartment for one month before she was required to sign a one-year lease on November 7, 1974. The lease contained an exculpatory clause which stated, in part, that the “[l]essor . . . shall not be liable for any damage done or occasioned by or from plumbing, gas, water,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Manufacturing Co. v. SlotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. College Mobile Home Park & Sales, Inc. v. HoffmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Wemer v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. Queen Insurance Co. of America v. KaiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Merten v. NathanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. George Washington University v. WeintraubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Myco, Inc. v. Super Concrete Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Richards v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Arnold v. Shawano County Agricultural SocietyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API