Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1941No. O-4076Published

1Opinion of the Court

OFFICE OF Y-HE AITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Honorable George Ii. Shepp~d Comptroller of Publla Aacounte AH8CII:, reus m6r Sir; 68king vhether or ‘,not oerteln m6t e “bu.lldLng materUle= ~,olthintheM Fe Tar fall. Your lot- tar rwlda 68 rge group of 1lnlber vhethep Or not the c lietsd, and eold vided that the terma "The lmber yarda are contending thet %he sale of the f'olloving mterial, when eald at Ium- her yard@, vi11 not make them subjeat to the etorb tax. Honorable George H. Sheppard, page 2 "1. COOLING SYSTEW : 1-A. COOLING SYSTEM WITH FAN. Representa- tive materials carried: (a)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Randall v. Atlanta Advertising ServiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Stone v. MorrisonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Hundhausen v. BondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Neekamp v. Huntington Chamber of CommerceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Wood Preserving Corporation v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API