Legal Opinion

Neekamp v. Huntington Chamber of Commerce

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1925No. C. C. 355PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

This is a suit in chancery, the sole object of which is to deny the defendants the right to use certain lots in the Tudell Addition, Westmoreland, in the City of Huntington, for the purpose of constructing and operating thereon a railroad sidetrack or spur-track. The lots referred to are owned by the defendant, Huntington Chamber of Commerce, which proposes to convey them to the defendant, The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, in consideration of which the railroad company has agreed to construct and operate thereon the spur-track referred to in order that transportation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. SpiveySupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. Deutsch v. Mortgage Securities Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Rouse v. Catskill & New York Steam-Boat Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Cole v. SeamondsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Mills v. EdgellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wallace v. St. ClairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Baltimore Butchers Abattoir & Live Stock Co. v. Union Rendering Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. AirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. West Virginia Department of Highways v. FarmerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ballard v. KitchenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API