Legal Opinion

Randall v. Atlanta Advertising Service

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1924No. 4418PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The city lot owned by Paul H. Eandall and also the city lot of M. W. Thompson, leased to Atlanta Advertising'’ Service, were originally owned by Mrs. Sarah J. Purtell. The plaintiff, Eandall, seeks to enjoin the erection of a billboard by the defendant Advertising Service, on the ground that such a billboard would constitute a “building” such as was contemplated in the building restriction quoted in the headnote, and which was contained in a deed by Mrs. Purtell to a predecessor in title of Eandall and included in all of the conveyances in the' chain of title under which Eandall holds. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Clark v. LeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Swasey v. County of ShastaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kitchens v. NolandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Thompson v. Glenwood Community Club Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Voyles v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  4. Jordan v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Smith v. Pindar Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API