Legal Opinion
Magna Associates v. Torgrove
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 23, 1984No. 84-K-155PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
KANE, District Judge.
Before me in this diversity case is defendant’s motion to dismiss. Torgrove argues convincingly that some or all of the claims for relief are barred by the appropriate statutes of limitations. For the reasons set out below, I agree and order the complaint dismissed.
Magna, a limited partnership organized under Colorado law, was formed in 1968 to acquire a building located in Denver, Colorado known as Brooks Towers. At present, there are a total of 53 limited partners, most of whom live in New York City. Torgrove and David Warshaw, an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Herman M. Wolf v. Preferred Risk Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Bishop v. State, Division of RetirementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Association of Owners, Satellite Apt., Inc. v. OtteColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hall v. SwanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Morgan v. Dain BosworthDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bauers v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
- Application of ChurchColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bennett Bear Creek Farm Water & Sanitation District v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1995