Legal Opinion
Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided August 10, 1999No. 91-0986-CIV-GOLDPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL ORDER REGARDING EXXON’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND PLAINTIFFS’ ENTITLEMENT TO PREJUDGMENT INTEREST
GOLD, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua sponte.1 In response to Plaintiffs’ cause of action for breach of contract, Exxon raised two affirmative defenses,2 which, it contends, precludes a finding of liability as to, at least some of, Plaintiffs’ claims: (1) the statutes of limitations in the various jurisdictions bar Plaintiffs’ action as untimely3; and (2) releases affecting in excess of 5,000 dealer-members preclude the instant claim for breach of contract. Exxon…
2Cases cited139 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- Masquat v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- City of St. Petersburg v. Total Containment, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.