Legal Opinion

United States v. Fidel Solorio-Tafolla

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 3, 2003No. 02-3274PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Circuit Judge.

Fidel Solorio-Tafolla (Solorio-Tafolla) appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute and possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1) and 846 (2000). Solorio-Tafolla argues the district court 1 erred by admitting opinion testimony from a police detective regarding drug trafficking, without satisfying the Daubert standard for expert testimony. The district court did not err in finding the detective’s testimony reliable and relevant. We affirm.

During Solorio-Tafolla’s jury trial, Detective…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. Kempis-BonolaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Spotted ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Ronald Gene Kenyon, Also Known as Ronald G. BingenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Orlando MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. BrinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Troy David ChaikaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API