Slomski v. Thermoclad Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice GREENSPAN.
This Court granted allocatur in order to determine whether Section 5603(q) of the Durable Power of Attorney Act, 20 Pa.C.S. §§ 5601-5611 (the Act), includes the power of the agent to change the beneficiary designation of a qualified retirement plan owned by the principal. For the reasons that follow, we hold that a principal’s Power of Attorney granting the agent the power to engage in retirement plan transactions authorized his agent to change the beneficiary of the principal’s retirement plan. We therefore reverse the order of the Superior Court.
On March 24, 2000,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re WeidnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Estate of Slomski v. Thermoclad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re Estate of SlomskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re: B. Fiedler, Appeal of: E. FiedlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re: B. Fiedler, Appeal of: E. FiedlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- In Re: Estate of Newcomer Appeal of: Newcomer, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- ROGERS v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Slomski v. Thermoclad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009