ROGERS v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARY ROGERS, MICHAEL ROGERS, MELISSA TOMASZEWSKI, 2:22-CV-00456-CCW Plaintiffs, v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINON AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Citizens Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See ECF No. 9. For the reasons that follow, Citizens’ Motion will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. Background The facts, as alleged in the Complaint, are as follows: Plaintiffs Mary Rogers, Michael Rogers, and Melissa Tomaszewski are the children…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.