Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Slomski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 2009No. 498 WAL 2008, 499 WAL 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue is:

Whether the “all powers” language in 20 Pa.C.S. § 5603(q) includes the power of the agent to change the beneficiary designation of a qualified retirement plan owned by the principal.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schimelfenig v. Com., Board of Law ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Slomski v. Thermoclad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Schimelfenig v. Com., Board of Law ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Slomski v. Thermoclad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Slomski v. Thermoclad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009