Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Slomski
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 2009No. 498 WAL 2008, 499 WAL 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue is:
Whether the “all powers” language in 20 Pa.C.S. § 5603(q) includes the power of the agent to change the beneficiary designation of a qualified retirement plan owned by the principal.
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Schimelfenig v. Com., Board of Law ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
4Cited by4 opinions
- Slomski v. Thermoclad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Schimelfenig v. Com., Board of Law ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Slomski v. Thermoclad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Slomski v. Thermoclad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009