Dusabek v. Martz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
RhI~EY, J.
Defendant in ei'i'Ol', as plaintiff below, obtained judgment in the trial court for libel against the plaintiffs in error, ~1s defendants below, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted. For convenience the parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.
The only matarial questions presented In this appeal are whether or not the article complained of in plaintiff's petition was libelous per se. and whether or not it was necessary for the plaintiff to prove actual damages in order to sustain the recovery.
The plaintiff was the editor and owner of the Okeene…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Montgomery v. KnoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Kee v. Armstrong, Byrd & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Kelly v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fite v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Knapp v. Post Printing & Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Tidmore v. MillsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Kleier Advertising, Inc. v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Garland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.