State v. Spencer
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellant was convicted under the habitual criminal act. The charging part of the information on which the conviction was had reads as follows:
‘ ‘ That said defendant, Ed Spencer, alias Eddie Rivers, alias Ed. Rivers, alias Ed Ralston, alias George Williams, on or about the 15th day of December, 1909, in the county of Dallas, state of Texas, under the name of Eddie Rivers, was then and there duly and legally *596convicted of the crime of burglary, the same being a felony at that time, and at all the times since, under the laws of the state of Washington.
“That on or about the 4th day of April,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GustafsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Weller v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. RowanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. CotzWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Campe v. LassenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EdelsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Edelstein v. HunekeWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. BoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- State v. MevisWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. LindseyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.