Legal Opinion
State v. Rowan
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1915No. 12480PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered June 20, 1914, upon a trial and conviction of robbery and of being an habitual criminal.
1Opinion of the Court
Holcomb, J.-
Appeal from conviction of the crime of robbery, and further conviction of being an habitual criminal. The information charging robbery accuses the appellant and two others as follows:
“That they, said Joseph Driscoll, Edward Rowan and Joseph Conroy, and each of them in the county of King, state of Washington, on the 27th day of January, 1914, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously, by means of force and violence to the person of one Ernest D. Sather, and by putting said Ernest D. Sather in fear of injury to his person, from the person and against the will of said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wood v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- State v. . BurkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- State v. PerleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
- State v. DengelWashington Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. EdelsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. GustafsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. CotzWashington Supreme Court · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.