Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Barrett v. Korbel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 2, 1974No. 44571PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a pro se appeal by a defendant in a paternity proceeding under Minn. St. 1969, § 257.19. Defendant, who was found by a jury to be the father of complainant’s child, contends, among other things, that he was denied his right to a speedy trial, that the prosecutor acted improperly, that the complainant’s testimony lacked credibility, and that the verdict was unsupported by the evidence. However, defendant has failed to comply with the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, specifically Rule 110.02 (with respect to a transcript of the proceedings) and Rule 128 (dealing with the contents of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Noltimier v. NoltimierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cole v. Star TribuneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Brett v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Thomale v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API