Legal Opinion
Cole v. Star Tribune
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 14, 1998No. C8-97-2281, C9-98-50PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
Appellants Cole and Brehmer & Rosen seek review of (1) an adverse summary judgment in a defamation action, and (2) the district court’s imposition of bad faith costs and fees. Respondents Sibenaller, Mundt, and Bates move to strike portions of appellants’ briefs and for an award of bad faith costs and fees on appeal. We affirm summary judgment and grant respondents’ motions.
FACTS
In 1997, appellant Harvey James Cole, represented by appellant Brehmer & Rosen, P.L.L.P., commenced a defamation action against respondents Minneapolis Star Tribune, Cowles Media Co., St. Paul…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Daniel Johnson v. Joe Kegans and John HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Layne v. Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Maethner v. Someplace Safe, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Darren COUTURE v. Britini TRAINER and Caitlyn TrainerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Ladd v. UeckerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- Hartford v. HartfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Kocontes v. McQuaidNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.