Miller v. Schweickart
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Upon the argument of the parties’ respective motions, 1 plaintiffs’ counsel acknowledged there was no basis upon which to oppose the motion of defendant Josephthal & Co. (“Josephthal”) for summary judgment, and accordingly it is granted. The sole issue remaining is whether, in addition to allowable statutory costs, defendant should be granted reasonable counsel fees incurred in defense of this action to be assessed against the plaintiffs, as authorized by section 11(e) of the Securities Act of 1933. 2
The complaint in this derivative and class action…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Katz v. Amos Treat & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Steve Karathanos and John KarathanosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,247 Aid Auto Stores, Inc. v. Herbert S. Cannon and Cannon, Jerold & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Murchison v. KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
3Cited by23 opinions
- Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Savino v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Tedeschi v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Keith M. Rhinehart v. Beverly StaufferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.