Legal Opinion

Smith v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 24, 1997No. 2755PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Chief Judge:

Alphonso Smith appeals from the circuit court’s affirmance of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that he suffered a 12% permanent disability to his spine and allowing his employer, the South Carolina Department of Mental Health (DMH), to stop payment of his temporary benefits. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I

In 1975, when he was still in high school, Smith was categorized as “educable retarded,” with a full scale I.Q. of 64. The record, however, reveals that Smith giggled and flirted with the examiner during the tests, and that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ham v. Mullins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. Rodney v. Michelin Tire Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Stono River Environmental Protection Ass'n v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Colvin v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. Tall Tower, Inc. v. South Carolina Procurement Review PanelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fishburne v. ATI Systems InternationalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Hendricks v. Pickens CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Smith v. SC Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Trotter v. TRANE COIL FACILITYCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Halsey v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API