Legal Opinion

Motor Bankers Corp. v. C. I. T. Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 9, Calendar No. 35,971PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is an action to recover damages for an alleged conversion of an automobile. Decision turns upon whether the following so-called trust receipt, accompanied by an accepted time draft, was a conditional sale in the nature of a chattel mortgage, and, for want of registration, no protection against a subsequent good-faith purchaser or mortgagee.

“TRUST RECEIPT.
“Detroit, Michigan, March 8, 1929.
“Received from C. I. T. Corporation, the owner thereof (hereinafter termed C. I. T.) Hudson motor vehicle; model 7-pass, sedan; serial No. 41900; Motor No. 579231, complete with all standard catalogue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. WieselbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Nelson v. ViergiverMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McLeod-nash Motors, Inc. v. Commercial Credit TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. People v. EtzlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Daas v. Contract Purchase Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Seattle Ass'n of Credit MenWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KlineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API