Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Pocasset v. Melton & Holmes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1932No. 20755PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.

Plaintiffs instituted suit against defendant bank, seeking to recover damages for the wrongful conversion! of six bales of cotton of the value of $255. Defendant answered by special denial that plaintiffs were not the owners and in possession of said cotton, and specifically denied that it converted to its own use and benefit any cotton belonging to plaintiffs.

Defendant, further answering, alleged that A. T. Lyons delivered to defendant five bales of cotton and no more, with authority for defendant to sell the same and apply the proceeds on indebtedness due defendant secured by a mortgage on…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Lawton v. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Murrell v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Griffith v. McBrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Sisler v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Hawkins v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API