Legal Opinion
Murrell v. Griswold
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 14, 1959No. 38262PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
The parties occupy the same relative position here that they occupied in the trial court. Plaintiff-in-error, W. P. Murrell, will therefore be referred to herein as “plaintiff” and defendant-in-error, John I. Griswold, will be referred to as “defendant”.
In March, 1954, plaintiff sold defendant a retail beer business at Norman, Oklahoma, which business was operated under the name “Anchor Tap Room”. In referring to said business herein we will use said name. The consideration that defendant agreed to pay for Anchor Tap Room was either $5,300 or $6,123.05. The defendant contends…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- First Nat. Bank of Pocasset v. Melton & HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Belcher v. SpohnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Sisler v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Caldwell v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Ruth G. Thornburg Michael D. Thornburg David Jean Thornburg Kathy Ann NorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Davidson v. First Bank & Trust Co., YaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Davidson v. First Bank and Trust Co., YaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Benton v. OrtenbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Steakley Bros. Chevrolet, Inc. v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.