Legal Opinion

Woods v. Smith

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided February 28, 1969No. Civ. A. 2001PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARNOW, District Judge.

Limned by this controversy is the quandary in which federal judges from time to time find themselves because of diversity jurisdiction. A Florida feder-. al judge, with scant knowledge of Oklahoma law, must endeavor to decide the question presented as the courts of Oklahoma would decide it, without benefit of authoritative precedent from those courts.

The question presented is whether failure of a plaintiff to fasten and use a seat belt in an automobile, to which he had access, may be presented at the trial as contributory negligence barring recovery, or in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Marathon Battery Company v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Cheatham v. Van DalsemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Continental Oil Company v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Robinson v. BoneDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Britton v. DoehringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Joan Laverne Henderson, Omarie Henderson, Sharon Marie Hass, and James F. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. Breault v. Ford Motor CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Nash v. KamrathCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API