Legal Opinion

Cheatham v. Van Dalsem

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 1960No. 38544PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Plaintiff’s action is for damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of an automobile collision. Plaintiff was a passenger in a car driven by defendant Ray Atchley, which rammed the rear end of a car driven by defendant Norman Van Dalsem and owned by defendant Bob Parks. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court sustained the separate demurrers of defendants, Van Dalsem and Parks, and plaintiff dismissed as to defendant Atchley. After a motion for new trial was overruled, plaintiff perfected this appeal.

Pleadings

Plaintiff alleged that on December 24,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Munroe v. Schoenfeld & Hunter Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Larkey v. ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Sturdevant v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Taylor v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Porter v. Norton-Stuart Pontiac-Cadillac of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Dirickson v. MingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Schlender v. Andy Jansen CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Woodward v. KinchenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API