Legal Opinion
Bondyopadhyay v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 23, 2020No. 19-1831Published
1Opinion of the Court
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1831C Filed: June 23, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * PROBIR K. BONDYOPADHYAY, * * Plaintiff, * * v. Pro Se; Patent Infringement; Res * Judicata; Fifth Amendment Taking; UNITED STATES, * Fraud; Statute of Limitations. * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * Probir K. Bondyopadhyay, pro se, Houston, TX. Joshua I. Miller, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant. With him were Gary L. Hausken, Director, Commercial Litigation…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.