Legal Opinion

Knox v. Buckman Contracting Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1903No. S.F. No. 2431PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, brought here on the judgment-roll alone. Defendants demurred to the complaint for want of sufficient statement of facts, and their demurrer was overruled. They then answered, and judgment was after-wards rendered against them. They contend that their demurrer should have been sustained, and that therefore the judgment should be reversed.

The action is upon several promissory notes, but the only averment in the complaint as to a breach of appellants’ contract to pay any one of the notes is this: 1 ‘That the whole of said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Penrose v. WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hurley v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Roberts v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Richards v. Lake View Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Globe Hardware Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Krieger v. FeenyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Smith v. BentsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932
  4. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Lincoln County Bank v. FettermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API