Richards v. Lake View Land Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Defendant appeals upon the judgment-roll from a judgment for plaintiff, the point made by appellant being that the demurrer to the first, fifth, and seventh counts of the complaint should have been sustained.
The complaint contains several different counts. In each count there is an averment of an indebtedness of the appellant to a certain person upon a contract, and an assignment by such person of the alleged cause of action to respondent. In each of the counts, except the first, fifth, and seventh, there is an averment that the amount claimed “has not been paid, or any part thereof”; *643but in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Ryan v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Krieger v. FeenyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Knox v. Buckman Contracting Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Lincoln County Bank v. FettermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Preston v. Central California Water & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Harlan v. LambertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912