Legal Opinion
Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1948No. 3521PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Company1 is an Oklahoma corporation. It is engaged in the laundry and dry cleaning business. On January 1, 1931, The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut,2 issued to the Laundry Company its Bailees’ Customer policy of insurance by which it insured the Laundry Company “for account of whom it may concern” against loss or damage, with certain exceptions not here material, of goods and articles accepted by the Laundry Company from its customers to be laundered or dry cleaned, while in the laundry premises, or while being…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co. v. HarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hindman v. First Nat. Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Schreffler v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Hagan v. Scottish InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Neil Rogen v. Ilikon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Amazon, Inc. v. Cannondale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Fischer v. KletzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Nicodemus v. Union Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Blazer v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.