Legal Opinion
Blake v. Ambach
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 28, 1988No. 87 Civ. 4352 (WCC)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.
On April 8, 1986, plaintiffs George Blake (“Blake”) et al. brought an action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, seeking damages as well as injunctive relief against the revocation of Blake’s license to practice medicine in New York and California (Blake v. Lang, 669 F.Supp. 584 (1987). Defendants moved to dismiss the action on the ground that, pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine, the claim should have been presented to the state court. In an opinion and order dated April 8, 1987, this Court granted defendants’ motion.
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mir v. ZuckerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019