Legal Opinion

Geraldine Livermore, Personal Representative for the Estate of Roland E. Rohm, Deceased v. Daniel Lubelan and Jerry Ellsworth

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2007No. 06-1465PublishedCited by 198 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Daniel Lubelan and Jerry Ellsworth appeal the denial of their motion for summary judgment brought pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 56(c). Defendants argue that the district court mistakenly concluded that genuine issues of material fact precluded the entry of summary judgment and that it failed to consider whether defendants were entitled to qualified immunity from plaintiff Geraldine Liver-more’s Fourth Amendment claims. Defendants argue further that Livermore’s state law claims of gross negligence fail as a matter of Michigan law. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by198 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Chappell v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Pittman v. Cuyahoga County Department of Children & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Binay v. BettendorfCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Harris v. City of CirclevilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API