Binay v. Bettendorf
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants, Officers Pongracz and Bettendorf, appeal the district court’s orders denying summary judgment to Defendants on the basis that they are not entitled to qualified immunity under federal law or governmental immunity under Michigan law. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the district court’s orders.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Marion Binay, Joselito Binay, and Sean Binay brought this suit against Defendants, Downriver Area Narcotics Division (“DRANO”), Lieutenant Menna, and Officers Jones, Bettendorf, Brown and Pongracz, alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by310 opinions
- Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Tyron Brown v. Lee LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Paterek v. Village of Armada, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Nathaniel Brent v. Wayne Cty. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Bazzi v. City of DearbornCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
305 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.