Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Bogart

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles A. Kuffner, Jr., J.

On June 15, 1990, the defendant, Kirk Bogart, entered a plea of guilty to the charge of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.39).

Subsequently, this court ordered the Department of Probation to prepare a presentence investigation report (CPL 390.20 [1]). The Department of Probation informed the defendant that pursuant to departmental policy, assistance of counsel was prohibited at the presentence interview, absent a court order.

The defendant has declined to be interviewed without his '…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. People v. PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. LazzarinoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993
  2. People v. CeasarNew York Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API