People v. Perry
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
"Wachtler, J.
Both of these appeals challenge the constitutionality of CPL 390.50 which permits a sentencing court in its discretion, to withhold disclosure of presentence investigative reports.
In connection with the burglary of a Manhasset delicatessen, defendant Perry was charged with burglary in the. third degree, petit larceny and possession of burglar tools. He subsequently *118pleaded guilty to criminal trespass in the second degree. At sentencing, defense counsel formally requested an opportunity to examine the probation report. After this request was denied, the defendant’s attorney…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by74 opinions
- People v. SparberNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. LeonNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Bigelow v. Board of Trustees of GouverneurNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.