Legal Opinion
Air King Products Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 29, 1950No. Civ. No. 10339PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
The three motions before the court will be disposed of in this single opinion.
The defendants move for a separate trial under Rules 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and for a stay of all depositions, interrogatories and other discovery or proceedings in any matter not involved in the license issues until such separate issues have been heard and determined.
Defendant’s second motion presents for hearing defendant’s objections to certain interrogatories heretofore propounded by the plaintiff.
The third motion is by the plaintiff to compel more…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
- Woburn Degreasing Co. v. Spencer Kellogg & SonsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Filtrol Corporation and Texaco, Inc. v. The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Morse/Diesel Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Md.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Cataphote Corporation v. DeSoto Chemical Coatings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1964
- Air King Products Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.