Legal Opinion
Schneider v. California Department of Corrections
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 24, 1997No. C-96-1739 SIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On March 14, 1997, the Court heard argument on defendants’ motion to dismiss. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby grants defendants’ motion to dismiss without leave to amend.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are current and former state inmates of Pelican Bay State Prison, California Correctional Institution, and the Central California Women’s Facility. The inmates allege that defendants California Department of Corrections (“CDC”) and James Gomez, Director of the CDC, have violated the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. City of Redwood City, California and Albert v. Pinotti, Individually and Dba the People's Police PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hatfield v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Schneider v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Schneider v. California Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Paul J. Schneider v. California Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Schneider v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.