Legal Opinion

Schneider v. California Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 2003No. 00-15795PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.

We must decide whether a State committed an unconstitutional taking by failing to pay interest on funds deposited in prison inmate trust accounts.

I

Paul J. Schneider and the other Plaintiffs-Appellants are current and former state inmates of the California penitentiary system. For security reasons, inmates are not permitted under California law to possess money while in prison. See 15 C.C.R. § 3006(b). Accordingly, the California Department of Corrections (“CDC”) has established two separate types of trust accounts into which personal funds may be placed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Legal Foundation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Estate of Jeffrey Ford v. Ramirez-PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Jerry Dempsey McIntyre v. Robert BayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Schneider v. California Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
  5. Schneider v. California Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paul J. Schneider v. California Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. (PC) Hunter v. RouseDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API