Legal Opinion

State v. Sanchez-Llamas

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2005No. CC 996212FE; CA A114418; SC S51289PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this criminal case, defendant contends that the trial court committed reversible error by refusing to suppress his post-arrest statements to the police. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion the judgment of the trial court. State v. Sanchez-Llamas, 191 Or App 399, 84 P3d 1133 (2004). We allowed defendant’s petition for review to consider his contention that the police violated his right to consular notification and communication, as guaranteed by Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR), 1 and that suppression of his post-arrest statements is the necessary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Foster v. NeilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  4. United States v. PerchemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  5. Clark v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Sorto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Torres De La Cruz v. MaurerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Owen v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. LongoOregon Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API