Legal Opinion

State v. Oppenheimer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 20, 1983No. 1 CA-CR 6239PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YALE McFATE, Judge

(Retired).

Appellant was charged by information with theft, in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1802, 13-1801. Subsequently, an allegation of prior conviction was filed. This matter proceeded to trial on April 19, 1982 and after a two day trial, the jury found appellant guilty as charged. The trial court sentenced him to the presumptive term of 11.-25 years for conviction of a class III felony with two prior convictions.

On appeal, appellant raises the following issues:

1. He was denied effective assistance of counsel at trial;

2. The prosecutor improperly introduced . evidence…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HankinsArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. MeekerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. SiddleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. State v. SammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. LaraArizona Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API