Legal Opinion

State v. Sammons

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1988No. CR-86-0317-APPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOELLER, Justice.

JURISDICTION

The offenses involved in this case relate to a “chop shop” operated in Tucson in late 1983 and early 1984. Testimony at trial explained that a “chop shop” is an operation in which vehicles are stolen and dismantled into salable component parts. After trial to a jury, defendant Aaron Scott Sammons was found guilty and sentenced on three counts of theft of property valued over $1,000, one count of attempted theft of property valued over $1,000, and one count of armed robbery. After sentencing, the state filed an appeal to Division Two of the court of appeals, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. NashArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Rose v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. DannArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Fernandez v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. TylerUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. David Leon Stokes, II v. Dora B. Schriro, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API