Legal Opinion

State of the Netherlands v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 14, 1951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a replevin action brought by the State of The Netherlands to recover four bearer bonds issued by United States corporations and now held by the defendant, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York'. This action was commenced in the Supreme Court of the State of New York and later removed to this court by the defendant, with the consent of the plaintiff. The defendant, claiming no title to these securities, and merely a stakeholder herein,- interpleaded one Verdun J. Archimedes, who in turn answered and counterclaimed, asserting title to the bonds.

On May 10, 1940,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Ricaud v. American Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of the Netherlands v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Oei Tjong Swan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  3. Otten v. MarascoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  4. Kalmich v. BrunoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  5. Jeanette Frocks, Inc. v. First Produce State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API