Legal Opinion

State of the Netherlands v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 21, 1953No. 22328_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

This action for the possession of four bearer bonds of American corporations 1 was instituted, in -the .New York Supreme Court by the State of the Netherlands against the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which now holds the bonds in a blocked account. The defendant removed the action to the federal court below in accordance with the provisions of. 12 U.S.C.A. § 632. At the same time it procured an order of interpleader against one Verdun J. Archimedes, who had been required to deposit the bonds with defendant and asserts title to ’ them. And defendant asked to be…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Wheaton v. SextonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. FLEMING v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Zittman v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bodner v. Banque ParibasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  2. Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. F. PALICIO Y COMPANIA, SA v. BrushDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. Agudas Chasidei Chabad v. Russian FederationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. Republic of China v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API