Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Schmitz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2009No. 20080191PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ronald E. Schmitz, ARRK Investments, Inc. (“ARRK”), and RES Investments, Inc. (“RES”), doing business as Ultimate Transportation, appeal from an amended judgment awarding Rodney Thompson and Karen Thompson damages for conversion, attorney fees, and costs and disbursements in their personal and shareholder derivative action involving ARRK. The Thompsons have cross-appealed. We conclude the district court erred in basing its decision on a theory not pled by the parties and in treating certain assets as non-corporate assets. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dole Food Co. v. PatricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Penn Nat. Gaming, Inc. v. RatliffMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Fleck v. Jacques Seed Co., Prescott, WisconsinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Airvator, Inc. v. Turtle Mountain Manufacturing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McColl Farms, LLC v. PflaumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Moody v. SundleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Reed v. Linehan (In Re Soporex, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  4. Thompson v. SchmitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Smestad v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API