Smestad v. Harris
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Bruce G. Harris appeals a district court judgment awarding Linda A. Smes-tad $30,025 plus interest on the theory of unjust enrichment. Harris argues the district court erred by (1) deciding the issue remanded without notifying Harris or holding a hearing, (2) considering unjust enrichment because Smestad’s complaint did not include an unjust enrichment claim and (3) finding Smestad proved unjust enrichment. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Our prior decision in this case contains the relevant facts, and we will not repeat them except as necessary to resolve the issues raised in this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Midland Diesel Service & Engine Co. v. SivertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Smestad v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Smestad v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- McDougall v. AgCountry Farm Credit Services, PCANorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Broten v. BrotenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.