Legal Opinion

Smestad v. Harris

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2012No. 20120051PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Bruce G. Harris appeals a district court judgment awarding Linda A. Smes-tad $30,025 plus interest on the theory of unjust enrichment. Harris argues the district court erred by (1) deciding the issue remanded without notifying Harris or holding a hearing, (2) considering unjust enrichment because Smestad’s complaint did not include an unjust enrichment claim and (3) finding Smestad proved unjust enrichment. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Our prior decision in this case contains the relevant facts, and we will not repeat them except as necessary to resolve the issues raised in this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Midland Diesel Service & Engine Co. v. SivertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Smestad v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Smestad v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. McDougall v. AgCountry Farm Credit Services, PCANorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Broten v. BrotenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API